Embedding is disabled, so just click the video below twice to watch it at YouTube. It’s in the 80% range of Rotten Tomatoes, but many critics are going apeshit for this movie.
Page 1
more
more
more
Standard
middle men. [trailer park.]
The 90’s version of the epic crime drama. At least, it looks like that’s what it becomes when everything goes to shit.
I’m keeping my fingers crossed that this marks the triumphant return of Luke Wilson.
more
more
Standard
western #14, 'hang 'em high.' [another day, another movie.]
With a title like Hang ’em High
Instead, it was far more ambiguous and intelligent than that. A wonderful film to watch after suffering through True Grit.
It was a great rumination on the relationship and differences between justice and vengeance, and most of the characters were a realistic mixture of good and bad. It was strong across the board, and there isn’t much more to say than that.
This was also the first film I’ve seen featuring the stunningly beautiful and heartbreakingly tragic Inger Stevens.
more
Standard
western #12, 'shane.' [another day, another movie.]
Another classic of the genre that I’d never seen before.
I was so impressed with how good it was. Such a great story, well directed and acted. Jack Palance was great in his small role as the gunslinger for hire, and Alan Ladd was fantastic, all 5’6″ of him.
It was so great. I was stunned by the emotional nuance and complexity, as well as how charged some scenes were. I really wasn’t expecting much going into it, and early on I was a little worried. But it really was a fantastic film. Tragic and beautiful.
It’s pretty rare, even in 2010, to find a film that leaves questions open for the viewer to decide. Yet, in 1953 Shane engages questions of violence, conflict, love, the value of human life and morality with subtlety and ambiguity. All that can’t be debated in the film’s message is that we make choices, and there are consequences, and usually life isn’t fair.
The climax of the film is so quiet and unassuming.
Ah, so good. For me this was the biggest surprise so far. I expected a generic Western. Instead I found genuinely moving storytelling.
more
Standard
western #11, 'unforgiven.' [another day, another movie.]
This is the first of the Westerns we have watched so far that I actually owned, so, obviously I liked this one going into it.
Eastwood responds to the Western genre that helped make his career. Even going so far as to say it basically encapsulates everything he feels about the genre.
It is slow and taut, filled with great characters played brilliantly by gifted actors.
If Cooperstown was for actors instead of baseball players, Gene Hackman would only have to screen The Royal Tenenbaums and Unforgiven back to back and he would have my vote to get in without any further conversation.
It doesn’t deal with the Native American issues, but it pulls back the curtain a bit on the rest of what lies implicit in the Western genre.
As is the case with much of Eastwood’s directorial work, the story turns the myth of redemptive violence on its head. There is always a cost.
Great movie, all around.
more
Standard
deathly hallows. [trailer park.]
This will probably get taken down in like ten minutes, but for now, here is about a minute of new Harry Potter goodness.
more
Standard
western #6, 'the searchers.' [another day, another movie.]
The Searchers is another movie praised quite highly by AFI. Not only was it #12 on the ‘100 Years, 100 Movies’ list, they also selected it as the greatest Western of all time.
Directed by John Ford, it was released almost twenty years after Stagecoach.
The Positives: Visually, The Searchers was really impressive. Ford clearly took great pains to find remarkable shots and angles, and it was most certainly a beautiful film from that standpoint. There were moments where I found myself enjoying the film in spite of myself, which is no small praise.
The movie, up until the last ten minutes or so, was also far more ambiguous about racism than Stagecoach. Much of the racism was named and some even condemned in the text of the film.
There was also ambiguity in the morality of the characters. Wayne’s character was a thief with legitimate rage issues, and they never apologized or demonized it, they just let the character be. That’s something I didn’t expect, and it was refreshing.
The Negatives: For one, I’m decidedly not a John Wayne fan. I wonder if perhaps it is just different sensibilities in different eras, but to me all of his characters just seem drunk most of the time. His long, drawling speech coupled with his clumsy and awkward gait and movements just come across as being a lush, not an everyman.
Also, while I commend Ford for even attempting to address the racism in society and film, he ultimately failed. The racism was so deep that even the attempt to condemn racism was racist. For goodness sake, the main villain of the film was a Commanche war chief played by a German man painted a bronzish tan color… that’s right, a painted German guy.
Also, any ambiguity the film lets sit in the air during the movie falls apart during the climax, when all the white people kill off all the Indians and live happily ever after. Hooray!
It was almost as if Ford was saying, ‘Hey racism makes me uncomfortable, it’s downright sad even. But, they are savages, so what are you really going to do about it? If they refused to become “Americans” like us, they needed to be dealt with eventually.’
I guess for me, it doesn’t really matter how well a movie is made when its messages are this ugly, whether that was the intent or not.
more